In a surprising case that has sent ripples through Kenya’s gemstone exchange community, two guys have been dragged into the spotlight for allegedly defrauding a businesswoman of an incredible twenty-four million shillings. The accused, Humphrey Mulindi Mathahana and Steve Ochieng’ Odhiambo, stand accused of manipulating the acceptance as true of Emily Saliton Mututua, a distinguished insider in the gemstone enterprise and the director of Milestone Gemstone Kenya Limited.

What makes this case especially egregious is the deceptive way in which the fraud was perpetrated, luring the sufferer into a properly orchestrated lure under the pretence of supporting her export of valuable tanzanite gemstones to Dubai.

The alleged incident, which spanned from early February to early March 2021, unfolded like a criminal offence thriller. The suspects reportedly operated underneath a calculated narrative that revolved around the illusion of lucrative global exchange. By invoking Dubai, a global hub for gem trading, the suspects managed to take advantage of the charm and promise of excessive returns, tricking the victim into delivering high-value Tanzanite stones under false assurances.

The courts have now taken up the matter, setting the stage for what should end up being a landmark case in the fight against industrial fraud in Kenya. The legal outcome could serve as a cautionary tale to different gamers within the gemstone enterprise, reminding them of the dangers lurking in apparently promising deals.

At the centre of this multi-million shilling scandal are 3 names to possibly echo through the corridors of the gemstone exchange for the long term. First, there’s Emily Saliton Mututua, a businesswoman with vested interests in Tanzania’s Tanzanite market. As the director of Milestone Gemstone Kenya Limited, she had the cause and the approach to take part in global gem trading. Her purpose to promote Tanzanite in Dubai appeared like a trendy enterprise flow—until it turned into a financial nightmare.

Then there are Humphrey Mulindi Mathahana and Steve Ochieng’ Odhiambo, the two accused fraudsters. Not a whole lot is publicly recognised about them, but what’s clear is that they presented themselves as specialists capable of brokering a gemstone sale abroad. Using this façade, they allegedly convinced Emily to entrust them with her valuable stones, totalling over 687 carats across 3 distinct transactions.

Humphrey Mulindi Mathahana and Steve Ochieng’ Odhiambo

These individuals are now facing the full pressure of the law, with the courtroom taking a difficult look at their movements. With multiple charges laid against them, they can be searching at severe jail time if found guilty. The complexity of the case lies now not just in the stolen quantity but also in how it was executed—carefully, cunningly, and with an excessive degree of manipulation.

Fraudsters rarely walk into their victims’ lives without a game plan, and in this case, it appears the suspects had a full blueprint equipped. They allegedly recognised an enterprise possibility ripe for exploitation and executed a multi-stage con that played out over several weeks. It commenced with gaining the victim’s belief, something that takes more than just a fake ID or a flowery match. This often involves staged conferences, faux documentation, persuasive speak about global buyers, and a deep understanding of the way the gemstone marketplace operates.

The fraudulent operation reportedly commenced with conversations around the logistics and capacity profits of promoting Tanzanite in Dubai. This isn’t sudden—Dubai is one of the most trusted international trading centres for gems, so invoking its call clearly offers an air of secrecy of legitimacy. The suspects, capitalising on this belief, probably provided fabricated commercial enterprise contacts or even fake invoices and alternative documentation to make the scheme believable.

According to the prices filed, they managed to extract gemstones from Emily in 3 separate tranches, on every occasion with the pretence of desiring to put together the shipment or negotiate with the overseas client. By stringing her along, they kept the phantasm alive till it became too late. This kind of fraud is frequently hard to stumble on until the victim realises there’s no purchaser, no deal, and no gemstones left in their possession.

The cornerstone of this fraudulent operation became deception. The suspects are accused of falsely promising a sale in Dubai—a claim they allegedly knew was baseless from the start. False pretense is not an unusual tactic in industrial fraud. It preys on ambition and accepts as true the hope of better enterprise prospects. In Emily’s case, her belief in the suspects’ story led her to evidence with tanzanite valued at over 24 million Kenyan shillings.

This wasn’t a one-off instance of deceit; it became a scientific effort involving cautiously timed promises and strategic manipulation. Each instance of gemstone handover was reportedly sponsored by using reassurances of pending deals, upcoming bills, or final negotiations with foreign consumers. This tactic not only satisfied Emily to continue presenting greater gemstones but also additionally delayed any suspicion till the complete con had already been performed.

False pretense is punishable under Section 317 of the Penal Code in Kenya, and if established, the suspects could face a vast prison sentence. What makes the case especially robust is the repeated sample of fraudulent acquisition—3 separate incidents, all with comparable methods. This consistency strengthens the prosecution’s case and paints a clean picture of premeditated fraud.